The meaning of political science is often restricted to the state, government, and everyday politics. However, it goes beyond that. We as humans share various relationships. What do we do when conflicts arise in these relationships? How do we resolve them? The Socratic dialectical method or Habermas’ idea of deliberation provides a solution. It says conflicts are better resolved through dialogue rather than domination. Hence, it tells us how to talk in a dialectical manner. It is the process of reasoning together. For instance, when your father asks you to aim for a government job, but you want to become a content creator, you do not totally oppose each other. Instead, you engage rationally: Why is a government job important? Maybe because it provides security and financial stability. But being a content creator might give you creative freedom. So you decide to take a government job but also start your creator journey simultaneously — maybe by vlogging your day as a government employee...
We often lose track of ourselves in the hustle and bustle of our daily lives, becoming so engrossed in our thoughts that we fail to stop and observe ourselves. Ego and arrogance are the results of our restricted perspective flowing from ignorance. When we block our mind knowingly or unknowingly and limit our understanding to ourselves only we are in the clutches of ego and arrogance. While philosophical interpretations of the two concepts are varied, in general terms ego can be defined as an attitude(towards ourselves) or feeling related to self-importance and limited to the self only in a way that individuals try to portray themselves as superior. Arrogance is related to others and is visible when expressed with reference to them either through words or actions. Ego is a human trait visible in itself. For example, a person full of ego would never accept their mistake even if they are wrong but the arrogant person would not only not accept the mistake but might also say that even if I ...