The meaning of political science is often restricted to the state, government, and everyday politics. However, it goes beyond that. We as humans share various relationships. What do we do when conflicts arise in these relationships? How do we resolve them? The Socratic dialectical method or Habermas’ idea of deliberation provides a solution. It says conflicts are better resolved through dialogue rather than domination. Hence, it tells us how to talk in a dialectical manner. It is the process of reasoning together. For instance, when your father asks you to aim for a government job, but you want to become a content creator, you do not totally oppose each other. Instead, you engage rationally: Why is a government job important? Maybe because it provides security and financial stability. But being a content creator might give you creative freedom. So you decide to take a government job but also start your creator journey simultaneously — maybe by vlogging your day as a government employee...
Introduction Interpretation of Ambedkar as a revolutionary figure of the scheduled castes must not restrict our understanding of him as someone who only worked and presented ideas on the Scheduled Caste of this country. Ambedkar had done profound works on various other subjects like economics, women, constitution, labour naming a few. He, as a chief architect of the constitution itself, demonstrates how diverse and comprehensive his thinking was. Unfortunately, Ambedkar's views on caste have overshadowed his views on all other important issues concerning human life. As a result, he has become a political and religious tool whom everyone passionately wants to appropriate. He is appropriated by the right for political purposes, by the left to counter Brahmanism & for gender justice and by the Muslims to counter the Hindu right-wing. To illustrate an example Ambedkar's ideas on Islam have never been explicitly talked about. We have always seen the appropriation of Am...