The meaning of political science is often restricted to the state, government, and everyday politics. However, it goes beyond that. We as humans share various relationships. What do we do when conflicts arise in these relationships? How do we resolve them? The Socratic dialectical method or Habermas’ idea of deliberation provides a solution. It says conflicts are better resolved through dialogue rather than domination. Hence, it tells us how to talk in a dialectical manner. It is the process of reasoning together. For instance, when your father asks you to aim for a government job, but you want to become a content creator, you do not totally oppose each other. Instead, you engage rationally: Why is a government job important? Maybe because it provides security and financial stability. But being a content creator might give you creative freedom. So you decide to take a government job but also start your creator journey simultaneously — maybe by vlogging your day as a government employee...
source: internet Unprecedented times come with unimaginable challenges. The challenge that India is facing today is this pandemic. Research and academic works vis-a-vis the coronavirus pandemic are flooding. One debate that has still not been revived is the philosophical debate of morality, duty, and charity. With the increasing gravity of this pandemic, the authoritative direction by the general public to the affluent Indian is gaining momentum and that is to help the country financially. The recent target being the IPL which is happening in the middle of a health crisis. There is a grave problem that lies under the basic arguments against or favoring the IPL. Most people object to it because they think that the money spent on IPL should be spent on containing the virus and treating the people. This takes us to a deeper question: why should the players/or franchise pay? Are they obliged to pay I.e is it their duty or charity? Many people who oppose it must have been think...